This post was contributed by a community member. The views expressed here are the author's own.

Community Corner

Making a Difference: Duxbury Style

WRITTEN BY GILLIAN SMITH

GILLIAN SMITH

Selectman Shawn Dahlen explained ...“The town of Duxbury is neither the developer nor the person putting this together,  we are a consumer and we are consuming credits that will amount to a considerable savings for the town.” (excerpt from G. Smith's ""Wind on the horizon: voters approve pursuing power agreement""  in the Duxbury Clipper)

Many of the world's countries were neither the developers or the sellers of South African krugerrands.  Those countries that purchased them were only the consumer of the gold pieces that were expected to amount to a beneficial  investment.  That  global policy stopped abruptly when a coalition of countries (consumers) took action to withdraw further and future Krugerrand purchases until the South African system of racial segregation (Apartheid) was eliminated.

Find out what's happening in Plymouthwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

I'd ask duxbury Selectmen... where's the difference?  Are Duxbury Selectmen enabling potential systematic harm upon neighbors of other towns by rewarding a Plymouth developer to deliver a fiscal benefit to Duxbury?  

Has history taught us nothing about 'blood money'?

Find out what's happening in Plymouthwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here

The views expressed in this post are the author's own. Want to post on Patch?